Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2024) and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and Google DeepMind. Claude 3.5 Sonnet ships a 200K-token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview ships a 1.048576M-token context window. On pricing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview costs $1.25/1M input tokens versus $3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is ~140% cheaper at $1.25/1M; pay for Claude 3.5 Sonnet only for coding workflow support.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2025-10-01 |
| Context window | 200K | 1.048576M |
| Parameters | 70B | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Unknown | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-04 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens | $1.25/1M tokens |
| Output price | $15/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, tool use: Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview, and code execution: Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Both models share vision, multimodal input, function calling, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude 3.5 Sonnet lists $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview lists $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview lower by about $2.72 per million blended tokens. Availability is 6 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview supports 1.048576M tokens, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview costs $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview open source?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is listed under Unknown. Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenRouter, and Microsoft Foundry. Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is available on Google AI Studio and GCP Vertex AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.