Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025) and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview (2025) are general-purpose language models from Anthropic and Google DeepMind. Claude Haiku 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview ships a 1.05m-token context window. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.80/1M input tokens versus $1.25/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is ~56% cheaper at $0.80/1M; pay for Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview only for long-context analysis.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysis |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | RAG, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 200k | 1.05m |
| Cheapest output | $4/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 8 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $4/1M tokens.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 uniquely exposes Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Haiku 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Haiku 4.5
$1,640
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview
$3,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio
Estimated monthly gap: $1,860. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is $6/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Code execution before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 is $6/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 adds Code execution in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-10-01 | 2025-10-01 |
| Context window | 200k | 1.05m |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-02 | 2025-01 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.80/1M tokens | $1.25/1M tokens |
| Output price | $4/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on code execution: Claude Haiku 4.5. Both models share vision, multimodal input, function calling, and tool use, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Haiku 4.5 lists $0.80/1M input and $4/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview lists $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Claude Haiku 4.5 lower by about $2.12 per million blended tokens. Availability is 8 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when coding workflow support, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview when long-context analysis and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview supports 1.05m tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.80/1M input and $4/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview costs $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview open source?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is listed under Proprietary. Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Snowflake Cortex, AWS Bedrock, and GCP Vertex AI. Gemini 2.5 Pro Computer Use Preview is available on Google AI Studio and GCP Vertex AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-25. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.