Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
Claude Opus 4.5 (2025) and GLM-5V-Turbo (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and Zhipu AI. Claude Opus 4.5 ships a 200K-token context window, while GLM-5V-Turbo ships a 200k-token context window. On pricing, GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.2/1M input tokens versus $5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
GLM-5V-Turbo is ~317% cheaper at $1.2/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.5 only for coding workflow support.
Specs
| Released | 2025-11-01 | 2026-04-01 |
| Context window | 200K | 200k |
| Parameters | — | 744B total, 40B active |
| Architecture | decoder only | mixture of experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Claude Opus 4.5 | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $1.2/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $4/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Claude Opus 4.5 | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on code execution: Claude Opus 4.5. Both models share vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, and function calling, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Opus 4.5 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens, while GLM-5V-Turbo lists $1.2/1M input and $4/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GLM-5V-Turbo lower by about $8.96 per million blended tokens. Availability is 6 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose GLM-5V-Turbo when vision-heavy evaluation and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens, while GLM-5V-Turbo supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens. GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.2/1M input and $4/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo open source?
Claude Opus 4.5 is listed under Proprietary. GLM-5V-Turbo is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Where can I run Claude Opus 4.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo?
Claude Opus 4.5 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, and OpenRouter. GLM-5V-Turbo is available on OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.