Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 Mini
Claude Opus 4.5 (2025) and GPT-4.1 Mini (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Claude Opus 4.5 ships a 200K-token context window, while GPT-4.1 Mini ships a 1M-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Claude Opus 4.5 leads by 57.3 pts. On pricing, GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.4/1M input tokens versus $5/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
GPT-4.1 Mini is ~1150% cheaper at $0.4/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.5 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $1.6/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 5 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | SWE-bench Verified leader | 3 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.5 leads the largest shared benchmark signal on SWE-bench Verified by 57.3 points.
- Claude Opus 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Claude Opus 4.5 uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- GPT-4.1 Mini has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GPT-4.1 Mini has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.6/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags GPT-4.1 Mini for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Claude Opus 4.5
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route: Anthropic
GPT-4.1 Mini
$720
Cheapest tracked route: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $9,530. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GPT-4.1 Mini is $23.40/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.5 is $23.40/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Opus 4.5 adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-11-01 | 2025-04-01 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | 2025-01 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $0.4/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $1.6/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.9 | 23.6 |
| Aider Polyglot | 72.0 | 32.4 |
| BFCL | 77.5 | 50.5 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Claude Opus 4.5 at 80.9 and GPT-4.1 Mini at 23.6, with Claude Opus 4.5 ahead by 57.3 points; Aider Polyglot has Claude Opus 4.5 at 72 and GPT-4.1 Mini at 32.4, with Claude Opus 4.5 ahead by 39.6 points; BFCL has Claude Opus 4.5 at 77.5 and GPT-4.1 Mini at 50.5, with Claude Opus 4.5 ahead by 27.0 points. The largest visible gap is 57.3 points on SWE-bench Verified, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Claude Opus 4.5. Both models share vision, multimodal input, function calling, and tool use, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Opus 4.5 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens, while GPT-4.1 Mini lists $0.4/1M input and $1.6/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GPT-4.1 Mini lower by about $10.24 per million blended tokens. Availability is 5 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose GPT-4.1 Mini when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini?
GPT-4.1 Mini supports 1M tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini?
GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens. GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.4/1M input and $1.6/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini open source?
Claude Opus 4.5 is listed under Proprietary. GPT-4.1 Mini is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini?
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-4.1 Mini expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-4.1 Mini?
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-4.1 Mini expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-4.1 Mini?
Claude Opus 4.5 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, GCP Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, and OpenRouter. GPT-4.1 Mini is available on OpenRouter, Replicate API, and OpenAI API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.