Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (2025) and DeepSeek R1 0528 (2025) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and DeepSeek. Claude Sonnet 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while DeepSeek R1 0528 ships a 130k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads by 1 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is safer overall; choose DeepSeek R1 0528 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 130k |
| Cheapest output | $15/1M tokens | $2.15/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 8 tracked | 7 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 3 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 1 points.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2.15/1M tokens.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 uniquely exposes Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags DeepSeek R1 0528 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Sonnet 4.5
$6,150
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Microsoft Foundry
DeepSeek R1 0528
$938
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $5,213. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and Microsoft Foundry; start route-level A/B tests there.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 is $12.85/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- DeepSeek R1 0528 adds Code execution in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on Microsoft Foundry, GCP Vertex AI, and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $12.85/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Code execution before moving production traffic.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 adds Vision, Multimodal, and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2025-05-28 |
| Context window | 200k | 130k |
| Parameters | — | 685B total, 37B active (MoE) |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $0.50/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $2.15/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | DeepSeek R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 86.0 | 85.0 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.2 | 57.6 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 83.4 | 81.0 |
Continue comparing
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 0528
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Kimi K2.6
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.5
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GLM-5
Popular comparisons for Claude Sonnet 4.5
Popular comparisons for DeepSeek R1 0528
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.