LLM Reference

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemma 4 12B IT

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (2025) and Gemma 4 12B IT (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and Google DeepMind. Claude Sonnet 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while Gemma 4 12B IT ships a 256k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads by 8.8 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Gemma 4 12B IT is safer overall; choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when vision-heavy evaluation matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemma 4 12B IT
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agentsreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window200k256k
Cheapest output$15/1M tokens-
Provider routes8 tracked2 tracked
Shared benchmarksMMLU PRO leader2 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when...
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 8.8 points.
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Gemma 4 12B IT when...
  • Gemma 4 12B IT has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Local decision data tags Gemma 4 12B IT for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

$6,150

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Microsoft Foundry

Gemma 4 12B IT

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Claude Sonnet 4.5 -> Gemma 4 12B IT
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemma 4 12B IT; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Gemma 4 12B IT -> Claude Sonnet 4.5
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemma 4 12B IT and Claude Sonnet 4.5; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-09-292026-06-03
Context window200k256k
Parameters12B
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyDecoder Only
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0OSI-approved
OpennessProprietaryOpen source
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: permitted
Knowledge cutoff2025-122025-01

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemma 4 12B IT
Input price
0-200,001t
$3/1M tokens
200,001t+
$6/1M tokens
-
Output price
0-200,001t
$15/1M tokens
200,001t+
$22.50/1M tokens
-
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemma 4 12B IT
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Function callingYesYes
Tool useYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemma 4 12B IT
MMLU PRO86.077.2
Google-Proof Q&A83.478.8

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, MMLU PRO has Claude Sonnet 4.5 at 86 and Gemma 4 12B IT at 77.2, with Claude Sonnet 4.5 ahead by 8.8 points; Google-Proof Q&A has Claude Sonnet 4.5 at 83.4 and Gemma 4 12B IT at 78.8, with Claude Sonnet 4.5 ahead by 4.6 points. The largest visible gap is 8.8 points on MMLU PRO, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint is close: both models cover vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Claude Sonnet 4.5 has $3/1M input tokens and Gemma 4 12B IT has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 8 tracked routes versus 2. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Gemma 4 12B IT when long-context analysis and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemma 4 12B IT?

Gemma 4 12B IT supports 256k tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemma 4 12B IT open source?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is listed under Proprietary. Gemma 4 12B IT is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemma 4 12B IT?

Both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemma 4 12B IT expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemma 4 12B IT?

Both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemma 4 12B IT expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemma 4 12B IT?

Both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemma 4 12B IT expose reasoning mode. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemma 4 12B IT?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Snowflake Cortex, GCP Vertex AI, and AWS Bedrock. Gemma 4 12B IT is available on Hugging Face Inference Endpoints and Kaggle Models. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.