LLM Reference

Code Davinci 001 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Code Davinci 001 (2021) and DeepSeek V4 Flash (2026) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Code Davinci 001 ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while DeepSeek V4 Flash ships a 1m-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: Code Davinci 001 is coding-specialized model, while DeepSeek V4 Flash is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalCode Davinci 001DeepSeek V4 Flash
Product typeCoding-specialized modelStandalone API model
Best forcustom coding agents and code generationreasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysis
Decision fitCodingCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window1m
Cheapest output-$0.12/1M tokens
Provider routes0 tracked5 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Code Davinci 001 when...
  • Local decision data tags Code Davinci 001 for Coding.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash when...
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash uniquely exposes Reasoning, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags DeepSeek V4 Flash for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Code Davinci 001

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

DeepSeek V4 Flash

$76.26

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Code Davinci 001 -> DeepSeek V4 Flash
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Code Davinci 001 and DeepSeek V4 Flash; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash adds Reasoning, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
DeepSeek V4 Flash -> Code Davinci 001
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for DeepSeek V4 Flash and Code Davinci 001; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, JSON / Tool use, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2021-07-012026-04-24
Context window1m
Parameters284B
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyMixture of Experts
LicenseProprietaryMITOSI-approved
OpennessProprietaryOpen source
WeightsNot releasedAvailable
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: conditionalCommercial use: permitted
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeCode Davinci 001DeepSeek V4 Flash
Input price-
Off-peak
$0.22/1M tokens
All UTC hours outside DeepSeek's peak windows. Cache-hit input: $0.007 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.22 per 1M; output: $0.66 per 1M.
Peak
$0.44/1M tokens
01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC. Cache-hit input: $0.014 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.44 per 1M; output: $1.32 per 1M.
Output price-
Off-peak
$0.66/1M tokens
All UTC hours outside DeepSeek's peak windows. Cache-hit input: $0.007 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.22 per 1M; output: $0.66 per 1M.
Peak
$1.32/1M tokens
01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC. Cache-hit input: $0.014 per 1M tokens; cache-miss input: $0.44 per 1M; output: $1.32 per 1M.
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityCode Davinci 001DeepSeek V4 Flash
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
JSON / Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-07-03. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.