Code Davinci 002 vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Code Davinci 002 (2021) and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct (2024) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Code Davinci 002 ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Code Davinci 002 is coding-specialized model, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Code Davinci 002 | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents and code generation | provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding | RAG, Long context, and Classification |
| Context window | — | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | $2.40/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 11 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Code Davinci 002 for Coding.
- Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Llama 3.1 405B Instruct uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.1 405B Instruct for RAG, Long context, and Classification.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Code Davinci 002
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
$2,520
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Code Davinci 002 and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Llama 3.1 405B Instruct adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Code Davinci 002; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2021-08-16 | 2024-07-23 |
| Context window | — | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 405B |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Llama 3 Community |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2023-12 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Code Davinci 002 | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $2.40/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $2.40/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Code Davinci 002 | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on structured outputs: Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Code Davinci 002 has no token price sourced yet and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has $2.40/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 11. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Code Davinci 002 when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Llama 3.1 405B Instruct when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Is Code Davinci 002 or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct open source?
Code Davinci 002 is listed under Proprietary. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is listed under Llama 3 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for structured outputs, Code Davinci 002 or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Code Davinci 002 and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?
Code Davinci 002 is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on OctoAI API (Deprecated), Together AI, Fireworks AI, IBM watsonx, and Scale AI GenAI Platform. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Code Davinci 002 over Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Code Davinci 002 is coding-specialized model, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive. If your workload also depends on coding workflow support, start with Code Davinci 002; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-16. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.