DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Trinity-Large-Thinking
DeepSeek R1 0528 (2025) and Trinity-Large-Thinking (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from DeepSeek and Arcee AI. DeepSeek R1 0528 ships a 160K-token context window, while Trinity-Large-Thinking ships a 256K-token context window. On Google-Proof Q&A, Trinity-Large-Thinking leads by 8.2 pts. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.1/1M input tokens versus $0.22/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
DeepSeek R1 0528 is ~120% cheaper at $0.1/1M; pay for Trinity-Large-Thinking only for long-context analysis.
Specs
| Released | 2025-01-01 | 2026-04-01 |
| Context window | 160K | 256K |
| Parameters | 671B | 400B |
| Architecture | decoder only | Sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) |
| License | Open Source | Apache 2.0 |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| DeepSeek R1 0528 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/1M tokens | $0.22/1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.3/1M tokens | $0.85/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| DeepSeek R1 0528 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 0528 | Trinity-Large-Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Google-Proof Q&A | 81.0 | 89.2 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, Google-Proof Q&A has DeepSeek R1 0528 at 81 and Trinity-Large-Thinking at 89.2, with Trinity-Large-Thinking ahead by 8.2 points. The largest visible gap is 8.2 points on Google-Proof Q&A, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on function calling: Trinity-Large-Thinking, tool use: Trinity-Large-Thinking, and code execution: DeepSeek R1 0528. Both models share reasoning mode and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, DeepSeek R1 0528 lists $0.1/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens, while Trinity-Large-Thinking lists $0.22/1M input and $0.85/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts DeepSeek R1 0528 lower by about $0.25 per million blended tokens. Availability is 5 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 when coding workflow support, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Trinity-Large-Thinking when long-context analysis and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Trinity-Large-Thinking?
Trinity-Large-Thinking supports 256K tokens, while DeepSeek R1 0528 supports 160K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Trinity-Large-Thinking?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.1/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens. Trinity-Large-Thinking costs $0.22/1M input and $0.85/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 or Trinity-Large-Thinking open source?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is listed under Open Source. Trinity-Large-Thinking is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for reasoning mode, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Trinity-Large-Thinking?
Both DeepSeek R1 0528 and Trinity-Large-Thinking expose reasoning mode. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for function calling, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Trinity-Large-Thinking?
Trinity-Large-Thinking has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run DeepSeek R1 0528 and Trinity-Large-Thinking?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is available on Together AI, Fireworks AI, GCP Vertex AI, Novita AI, and OpenRouter. Trinity-Large-Thinking is available on Arcee AI and OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.