LLM Reference

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Grok Build 0.1

DeepSeek V3 0324 (2025) and Grok Build 0.1 (2026) compare a standalone API model against a coding-specialized model. DeepSeek V3 0324 ships a 160K-token context window, while Grok Build 0.1 ships a 256K-token context window. On pricing, DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27/1M input tokens; Grok Build 0.1 ranges from $1 to $2/1M input tokens by tier. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: DeepSeek V3 0324 is standalone API model, while Grok Build 0.1 is coding-specialized model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalDeepSeek V3 0324Grok Build 0.1
Product typeStandalone API modelCoding-specialized model
Best forprovider-routed productioncustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops
Decision fitCoding, Agents, and Long contextCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window160K256K
Cheapest output$1.12/1M tokens$2/1M tokens
Provider routes3 tracked3 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when...
  • DeepSeek V3 0324 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.12/1M tokens.
  • Local decision data tags DeepSeek V3 0324 for Coding, Agents, and Long context.
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when...
  • Grok Build 0.1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Grok Build 0.1 uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Grok Build 0.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324

$496

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Novita AI

Grok Build 0.1

$1,300

Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console

Estimated monthly gap: $804. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

DeepSeek V3 0324 -> Grok Build 0.1
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Grok Build 0.1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is $0.88/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Grok Build 0.1 adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.
Grok Build 0.1 -> DeepSeek V3 0324
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok Build 0.1 and DeepSeek V3 0324; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • DeepSeek V3 0324 is $0.88/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-03-242026-05-14
Context window160K256K
Parameters671B
Architecturedecoder only-
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeDeepSeek V3 0324Grok Build 0.1
Input price$0.27/1M tokens
0-200,001t
$1/1M tokens
200,001t+
$2/1M tokens
Output price$1.12/1M tokens
0-200,001t
$2/1M tokens
200,001t+
$4/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3 0324Grok Build 0.1
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Grok Build 0.1, function calling: Grok Build 0.1, tool use: Grok Build 0.1, and structured outputs: Grok Build 0.1. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, DeepSeek V3 0324 lists $0.27/1M input and $1.12/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output. A 70/30 input-output blend puts DeepSeek V3 0324 lower by about $0.77 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 3 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 when provider fit and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Grok Build 0.1 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K tokens, while DeepSeek V3 0324 supports 160K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Grok Build 0.1?

DeepSeek V3 0324 lists $0.27/1M input and $1.12/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 or Grok Build 0.1 open source?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is listed under Open Source. Grok Build 0.1 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for reasoning mode, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run DeepSeek V3 0324 and Grok Build 0.1?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is available on Fireworks AI, Microsoft Foundry, and Novita AI. Grok Build 0.1 is available on xAI Console, Vercel AI Gateway, and OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-25. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.