Falcon 180B vs Nemotron 4 340B
Falcon 180B (2023) and Nemotron 4 340B (2025) are compact production models from Technology Innovation Institute (TII) and NVIDIA AI. Falcon 180B ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Nemotron 4 340B ships a 4K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.
Nemotron 4 340B is safer overall; choose Falcon 180B when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Falcon 180B | Nemotron 4 340B |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | Coding and Classification | Classification and JSON / Tool use |
| Context window | — | 4K |
| Cheapest output | - | $4.2/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Falcon 180B for Coding and Classification.
- Nemotron 4 340B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Nemotron 4 340B uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Nemotron 4 340B for Classification and JSON / Tool use.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Falcon 180B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Nemotron 4 340B
$4,410
Cheapest tracked route: DeepInfra
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Falcon 180B and Nemotron 4 340B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Nemotron 4 340B adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nemotron 4 340B and Falcon 180B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2023-11-28 | 2025-02-27 |
| Context window | — | 4K |
| Parameters | 180B | 340B |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Falcon 180B | Nemotron 4 340B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $4.2/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $4.2/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Falcon 180B | Nemotron 4 340B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on structured outputs: Nemotron 4 340B. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Falcon 180B has no token price sourced yet and Nemotron 4 340B has $4.2/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 2. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Falcon 180B when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Nemotron 4 340B when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Is Falcon 180B or Nemotron 4 340B open source?
Falcon 180B is listed under Apache 2.0. Nemotron 4 340B is listed under Unknown. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for structured outputs, Falcon 180B or Nemotron 4 340B?
Nemotron 4 340B has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Falcon 180B and Nemotron 4 340B?
Falcon 180B is available on Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS and Scale AI GenAI Platform. Nemotron 4 340B is available on NVIDIA NIM and DeepInfra. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Falcon 180B over Nemotron 4 340B?
Nemotron 4 340B is safer overall; choose Falcon 180B when provider fit matters. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Falcon 180B; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Nemotron 4 340B.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.