Falcon 180B vs Qwen3.5-9B
Falcon 180B (2023) and Qwen3.5-9B (2026) are general-purpose language models from Technology Innovation Institute (TII) and Alibaba. Falcon 180B ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Qwen3.5-9B ships a 262K-token context window. On Google-Proof Q&A, Qwen3.5-9B leads by 22.8 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Qwen3.5-9B is safer overall; choose Falcon 180B when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Falcon 180B | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | Coding and Classification | RAG, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Cheapest output | - | $0.15/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 1 rows | Google-Proof Q&A leader |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags Falcon 180B for Coding and Classification.
- Qwen3.5-9B leads the largest shared benchmark signal on Google-Proof Q&A by 22.8 points.
- Qwen3.5-9B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Qwen3.5-9B has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Qwen3.5-9B uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Qwen3.5-9B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Falcon 180B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Qwen3.5-9B
$118
Cheapest tracked route: Together AI
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Qwen3.5-9B adds Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2023-11-28 | 2026-03-02 |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Parameters | 180B | 9B |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Falcon 180B | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.1/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.15/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Falcon 180B | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Falcon 180B | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Google-Proof Q&A | 58.9 | 81.7 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, Google-Proof Q&A has Falcon 180B at 58.9 and Qwen3.5-9B at 81.7, with Qwen3.5-9B ahead by 22.8 points. The largest visible gap is 22.8 points on Google-Proof Q&A, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Qwen3.5-9B, multimodal input: Qwen3.5-9B, function calling: Qwen3.5-9B, tool use: Qwen3.5-9B, and structured outputs: Qwen3.5-9B. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Falcon 180B has no token price sourced yet and Qwen3.5-9B has $0.1/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 3. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Falcon 180B when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Qwen3.5-9B when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Is Falcon 180B or Qwen3.5-9B open source?
Falcon 180B is listed under Apache 2.0. Qwen3.5-9B is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Falcon 180B or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Falcon 180B or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, Falcon 180B or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for tool use, Falcon 180B or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Falcon 180B and Qwen3.5-9B?
Falcon 180B is available on Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS and Scale AI GenAI Platform. Qwen3.5-9B is available on Together AI, OpenRouter, and Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.