FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Ideogram 4.0
FLUX.1.1 [pro] (2024) and Ideogram 4.0 (2026) are general-purpose language models from Black Forest Labs and Ideogram. FLUX.1.1 [pro] ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Ideogram 4.0 ships a not-yet-sourced context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Ideogram 4.0 is safer overall; choose FLUX.1.1 [pro] when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | FLUX.1.1 [pro] | Ideogram 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and provider-routed production | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Vision | General |
| Context window | — | — |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 3 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] uniquely exposes Multimodal in local model data.
- Local decision data tags FLUX.1.1 [pro] for Vision.
- Use Ideogram 4.0 when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
FLUX.1.1 [pro]
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Ideogram 4.0
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for FLUX.1.1 [pro] and Ideogram 4.0; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Multimodal before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Ideogram 4.0 and FLUX.1.1 [pro]; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] adds Multimodal in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-10-01 | 2026-06-03 |
| Context window | — | — |
| Parameters | 12K | 9.3B |
| Architecture | Diffusion Transformer | Diffusion Transformer |
| License | Noncommercial | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open weights | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: non-commercial | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | FLUX.1.1 [pro] | Ideogram 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | FLUX.1.1 [pro] | Ideogram 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: FLUX.1.1 [pro]. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: FLUX.1.1 [pro] has no token price sourced yet and Ideogram 4.0 has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 3 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose FLUX.1.1 [pro] when provider fit and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Ideogram 4.0 when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Is FLUX.1.1 [pro] or Ideogram 4.0 open source?
FLUX.1.1 [pro] is listed under Noncommercial. Ideogram 4.0 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for multimodal input, FLUX.1.1 [pro] or Ideogram 4.0?
FLUX.1.1 [pro] has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run FLUX.1.1 [pro] and Ideogram 4.0?
FLUX.1.1 [pro] is available on Prodia, Microsoft Foundry, and Vercel AI Gateway. Ideogram 4.0 is available on Ideogram API. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick FLUX.1.1 [pro] over Ideogram 4.0?
Ideogram 4.0 is safer overall; choose FLUX.1.1 [pro] when provider fit matters. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with FLUX.1.1 [pro]; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Ideogram 4.0.
Continue comparing
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Ideogram 3.0 Ultra
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Mistral Nemotron
- FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] vs Ideogram 4.0
- FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Ideogram 4.0
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs ShieldGemma 9B
- Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs FLUX.1.1 [pro]
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemma 2 9B SahabatAI Instruct
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.