Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 vs Llama 3.3 70B
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 (2025) and Llama 3.3 70B (2025) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and AI at Meta. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 ships a 1M-token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B ships a 8K-token context window. On pricing, Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.9/1M input tokens versus $1.25/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 fits 125x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama 3.3 70B for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | RAG, Long context, and Vision | Agents, Vision, and Classification |
| Context window | 1M | 8K |
| Cheapest output | $10/1M tokens | $0.9/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 for RAG, Long context, and Vision.
- Llama 3.3 70B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.9/1M tokens.
- Llama 3.3 70B uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 70B for Agents, Vision, and Classification.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
$3,500
Cheapest tracked route: OpenRouter
Llama 3.3 70B
$945
Cheapest tracked route: Fireworks AI
Estimated monthly gap: $2,555. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 and Llama 3.3 70B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Llama 3.3 70B is $9.1/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- Llama 3.3 70B adds Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.3 70B and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 is $9.1/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Function calling before moving production traffic.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-05-06 | 2025-12-09 |
| Context window | 1M | 8K |
| Parameters | — | 70B |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | Unknown | True |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2024-12 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/1M tokens | $0.9/1M tokens |
| Output price | $10/1M tokens | $0.9/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Llama 3.3 70B, multimodal input: Llama 3.3 70B, function calling: Llama 3.3 70B, tool use: Llama 3.3 70B, and structured outputs: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 lists $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B lists $0.9/1M input and $0.9/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 3.3 70B lower by about $2.98 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 when long-context analysis and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Llama 3.3 70B when vision-heavy evaluation and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 supports 1M tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B supports 8K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 costs $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens. Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.9/1M input and $0.9/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 or Llama 3.3 70B open source?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 is listed under Unknown. Llama 3.3 70B is listed under True. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 and Llama 3.3 70B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 is available on OpenRouter. Llama 3.3 70B is available on Fireworks AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-11. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.