Gemini Deep Research vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Gemini Deep Research (2024) and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and AI at Meta. Gemini Deep Research ships a 128k-token context window, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is safer overall; choose Gemini Deep Research when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini Deep Research | Llama 3.2 90B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | tool-calling agents | multimodal apps |
| Decision fit | RAG, Agents, and Long context | RAG, Long context, and Vision |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | $1.80/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini Deep Research uniquely exposes Function calling and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini Deep Research for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
- Llama 3.2 90B Instruct uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.2 90B Instruct for RAG, Long context, and Vision.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemini Deep Research
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
$1,530
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini Deep Research and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Function calling and Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Llama 3.2 90B Instruct adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Gemini Deep Research; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
- Gemini Deep Research adds Function calling and Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-12-11 | 2025-09-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 90B |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Llama 3 Community |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2023-12 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini Deep Research | Llama 3.2 90B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $1.35/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $1.80/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini Deep Research | Llama 3.2 90B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Llama 3.2 90B Instruct, multimodal input: Llama 3.2 90B Instruct, function calling: Gemini Deep Research, and tool use: Gemini Deep Research. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Gemini Deep Research has no token price sourced yet and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct has $1.35/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 1 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Gemini Deep Research when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Instruct when vision-heavy evaluation are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini Deep Research or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?
Gemini Deep Research supports 128k tokens, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Gemini Deep Research or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct open source?
Gemini Deep Research is listed under Proprietary. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is listed under Llama 3 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Gemini Deep Research or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini Deep Research or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, Gemini Deep Research or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?
Gemini Deep Research has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Gemini Deep Research and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?
Gemini Deep Research is available on Google AI Studio. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-04. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.