Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
Gemma 2 27B (2024) and Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and Alibaba. Gemma 2 27B ships a 8k-token context window, while Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B ships a 262k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B fits 33x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Gemma 2 27B for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | provider-routed production | reasoning-heavy apps and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use | RAG, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 8k | 262k |
| Cheapest output | $0.24/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemma 2 27B has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Gemma 2 27B uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemma 2 27B for Coding, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B uniquely exposes Reasoning and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemma 2 27B
$124
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Bitdeer AI
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B adds Reasoning and Tool use in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B and Gemma 2 27B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Gemma 2 27B adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-06-27 | 2026-06-25 |
| Context window | 8k | 262k |
| Parameters | 27B | 35B total, 3B active |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Gemma | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Open weights | Open source |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.08/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $0.24/1M tokens | - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B, tool use: Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B, and structured outputs: Gemma 2 27B. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Gemma 2 27B has $0.08/1M input tokens and Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Gemma 2 27B when provider fit and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B when reasoning depth and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B?
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B supports 262k tokens, while Gemma 2 27B supports 8k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Gemma 2 27B or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B open source?
Gemma 2 27B is listed under Gemma. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for reasoning mode, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B?
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for tool use, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B?
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for structured outputs, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B?
Gemma 2 27B has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Gemma 2 27B and Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B?
Gemma 2 27B is available on GCP Vertex AI and Bitdeer AI. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-25. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.