LLM Reference

Gemma 3 12B vs GLM-5

Gemma 3 12B (2026) and GLM-5 (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and Zhipu AI. Gemma 3 12B ships a 33k-token context window, while GLM-5 ships a 200k-token context window. On pricing, Gemma 3 12B costs $0.04/1M input tokens versus $0.60/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Gemma 3 12B is ~1400% cheaper at $0.04/1M; pay for GLM-5 only for reasoning depth.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGemma 3 12BGLM-5
Best forprovider-routed productionreasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production
Decision fitClassification and JSON / Tool useCoding, RAG, and Agents
Context window33k200k
Cheapest output$0.13/1M tokens$2.08/1M tokens
Provider routes5 tracked7 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Gemma 3 12B when...
  • Gemma 3 12B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.13/1M tokens.
  • Local decision data tags Gemma 3 12B for Classification and JSON / Tool use.
Choose GLM-5 when...
  • GLM-5 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • GLM-5 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • GLM-5 uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GLM-5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Gemma 3 12B

Gemma 3 12B

$64.50

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

GLM-5

$1,000

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $936. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Gemma 3 12B -> GLM-5
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, GCP Vertex AI, and Novita AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • GLM-5 is $1.95/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • GLM-5 adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.
GLM-5 -> Gemma 3 12B
  • Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter, GCP Vertex AI, and Novita AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Gemma 3 12B is $1.95/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-01-012026-02-11
Context window33k200k
Parameters12B744B total, 40B active
Architecturedecoder onlymixture of experts
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Knowledge cutoff2024-082025-11

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemma 3 12BGLM-5
Input price$0.04/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Output price$0.13/1M tokens$2.08/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemma 3 12BGLM-5
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: GLM-5, function calling: GLM-5, and tool use: GLM-5. Both models share structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Gemma 3 12B lists $0.04/1M input and $0.13/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while GLM-5 lists $0.60/1M input and $2.08/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Gemma 3 12B lower by about $0.98 per million blended tokens. Availability is 5 providers versus 7, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Gemma 3 12B when provider fit and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose GLM-5 when reasoning depth, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 3 12B or GLM-5?

GLM-5 supports 200k tokens, while Gemma 3 12B supports 33k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or GLM-5?

Gemma 3 12B is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Gemma 3 12B costs $0.04/1M input and $0.13/1M output tokens. GLM-5 costs $0.60/1M input and $2.08/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Gemma 3 12B or GLM-5 open source?

Gemma 3 12B is listed under Proprietary. GLM-5 is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Gemma 3 12B or GLM-5?

GLM-5 has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, Gemma 3 12B or GLM-5?

GLM-5 has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Gemma 3 12B and GLM-5?

Gemma 3 12B is available on Cloudflare Workers AI, AWS Bedrock, OpenRouter, GCP Vertex AI, and Novita AI. GLM-5 is available on Fireworks AI, OpenRouter, Together AI, GCP Vertex AI, and NVIDIA NIM. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.