LLM Reference

Gemma 4 12B IT vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

Gemma 4 12B IT (2026) and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT (2026) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind. Gemma 4 12B IT ships a 256k-token context window, while Gemma 4 26B A4B IT ships a 256k-token context window. On Google-Proof Q&A, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads by a hair. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

Gemma 4 12B IT is safer overall; choose Gemma 4 26B A4B IT when provider fit matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGemma 4 12B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agentsmultimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsRAG, Agents, and Long context
Context window256k256k
Cheapest output-$0.33/1M tokens
Provider routes2 tracked6 tracked
Shared benchmarks1 rowsGoogle-Proof Q&A leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Gemma 4 12B IT when...
  • Gemma 4 12B IT uniquely exposes Vision, Reasoning, and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Gemma 4 12B IT for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B IT when...
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads the largest shared benchmark signal on Google-Proof Q&A by 0.4 points.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Gemma 4 26B A4B IT for RAG, Agents, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Gemma 4 12B IT

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

$131

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Gemma 4 12B IT -> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemma 4 12B IT and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Reasoning, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT -> Gemma 4 12B IT
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Gemma 4 12B IT; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Gemma 4 12B IT adds Vision, Reasoning, and Tool use in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-06-032026-03-31
Context window256k256k
Parameters11.9B26B
Architectureencoder free unified multimodal-
LicenseApache 2.0Open Source
Knowledge cutoff2025-012025-01

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGemma 4 12B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT
Input price-$0.06/1M tokens
Output price-$0.33/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGemma 4 12B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingYesYes
Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkGemma 4 12B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT
Google-Proof Q&A78.879.2

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, Google-Proof Q&A has Gemma 4 12B IT at 78.8 and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT at 79.2, with Gemma 4 26B A4B IT ahead by 0.4 points. The largest visible gap is 0.4 points on Google-Proof Q&A, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Gemma 4 12B IT, reasoning mode: Gemma 4 12B IT, and tool use: Gemma 4 12B IT. Both models share multimodal input, function calling, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Gemma 4 12B IT has no token price sourced yet and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has $0.06/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 6. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Gemma 4 12B IT when reasoning depth are central to the workload. Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B IT when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 12B IT or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 12B IT supports 256k tokens, while Gemma 4 26B A4B IT supports 256k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Gemma 4 12B IT or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT open source?

Gemma 4 12B IT is listed under Apache 2.0. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Gemma 4 12B IT or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 12B IT has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Gemma 4 12B IT or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Both Gemma 4 12B IT and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Gemma 4 12B IT or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 12B IT has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Gemma 4 12B IT and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 12B IT is available on Hugging Face Inference Endpoints and Kaggle Models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is available on Google AI Studio, GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, Together AI, and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-03. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.