LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

GLM-5 9B vs Grok 3 Mini

GLM-5 9B (2026) and Grok 3 Mini (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Zhipu AI and xAI. GLM-5 9B ships a 262K-token context window, while Grok 3 Mini ships a 131k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.

GLM-5 9B is safer overall; choose Grok 3 Mini when provider fit matters.

Specs

Released2026-02-152025-02-17
Context window262K131k
Parameters9
Architecturedecoder only-
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

GLM-5 9BGrok 3 Mini
Input price-$0.3/1M tokens
Output price-$0.5/1M tokens
Providers-

Capabilities

GLM-5 9BGrok 3 Mini
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: Grok 3 Mini, reasoning mode: GLM-5 9B, function calling: GLM-5 9B, tool use: GLM-5 9B, and structured outputs: Grok 3 Mini. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: GLM-5 9B has no token price sourced yet and Grok 3 Mini has $0.3/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose GLM-5 9B when reasoning depth and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Grok 3 Mini when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5 9B or Grok 3 Mini?

GLM-5 9B supports 262K tokens, while Grok 3 Mini supports 131k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is GLM-5 9B or Grok 3 Mini open source?

GLM-5 9B is listed under Open Source. Grok 3 Mini is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for multimodal input, GLM-5 9B or Grok 3 Mini?

Grok 3 Mini has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for reasoning mode, GLM-5 9B or Grok 3 Mini?

GLM-5 9B has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, GLM-5 9B or Grok 3 Mini?

GLM-5 9B has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run GLM-5 9B and Grok 3 Mini?

GLM-5 9B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Grok 3 Mini is available on OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.