GLM-5 9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
GLM-5 9B (2026) and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Zhipu AI and Alibaba. GLM-5 9B ships a 262k-token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ships a 262k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is safer overall; choose GLM-5 9B when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | GLM-5 9B | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | RAG, Agents, and Long context | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 262k | 262k |
| Cheapest output | - | $2.08/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Local decision data tags GLM-5 9B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
GLM-5 9B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
$728
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GLM-5 9B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B adds Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and GLM-5 9B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-15 | 2026-02-24 |
| Context window | 262k | 262k |
| Parameters | 9 | 122B |
| Architecture | decoder only | mixture of experts |
| License | MIT(OSI) | Apache 2.0(OSI) |
| Openness | Open source | Open source |
| Commercial use | Commercial use allowed | Commercial use allowed |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-11 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | GLM-5 9B | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.26/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $2.08/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | GLM-5 9B | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, multimodal input: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, and structured outputs: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. Both models share reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: GLM-5 9B has no token price sourced yet and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has $0.26/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 3. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose GLM-5 9B when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, GLM-5 9B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
GLM-5 9B supports 262k tokens, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports 262k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Is GLM-5 9B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B open source?
GLM-5 9B is listed under MIT. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, GLM-5 9B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, GLM-5 9B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for reasoning mode, GLM-5 9B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Both GLM-5 9B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B expose reasoning mode. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Where can I run GLM-5 9B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
GLM-5 9B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is available on OpenRouter, Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS, and Novita AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.