Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM-5
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (2026) and GLM-5 (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and Zhipu AI. Claude Sonnet 4.6 ships a 1M-token context window, while GLM-5 ships a 200k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by 1.8 pts. On pricing, GLM-5 costs $0.6/1M input tokens versus $3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.
GLM-5 is ~400% cheaper at $0.6/1M; pay for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1M | 200k |
| Cheapest output | $15/1M tokens | $2.08/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 5 tracked | 5 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | SWE-bench Verified leader | 2 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads the largest shared benchmark signal on SWE-bench Verified by 1.8 points.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Sonnet 4.6 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- GLM-5 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2.08/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags GLM-5 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$6,150
Cheapest tracked route: OpenRouter
GLM-5
$1,000
Cheapest tracked route: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $5,150. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GLM-5 is $12.92/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and GCP Vertex AI; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $12.92/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Code execution in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-17 | 2026-02-11 |
| Context window | 1M | 200k |
| Parameters | — | 744B total, 40B active |
| Architecture | decoder only | mixture of experts |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-12 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens | $0.6/1M tokens |
| Output price | $15/1M tokens | $2.08/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.6 | 77.8 |
| τ-bench | 87.5 | 82.1 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 79.6 and GLM-5 at 77.8, with Claude Sonnet 4.6 ahead by 1.8 points; τ-bench has Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 87.5 and GLM-5 at 82.1, with Claude Sonnet 4.6 ahead by 5.4 points. The largest visible gap is 5.4 points on τ-bench, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Claude Sonnet 4.6, multimodal input: Claude Sonnet 4.6, and code execution: Claude Sonnet 4.6. Both models share reasoning mode, function calling, tool use, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Sonnet 4.6 lists $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens, while GLM-5 lists $0.6/1M input and $2.08/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts GLM-5 lower by about $5.56 per million blended tokens. Availability is 5 providers versus 5, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose GLM-5 when provider fit and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1M tokens, while GLM-5 supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?
GLM-5 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens. GLM-5 costs $0.6/1M input and $2.08/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5 open source?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is listed under Proprietary. GLM-5 is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM-5?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM-5?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available on OpenRouter, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. GLM-5 is available on Fireworks AI, OpenRouter, Together AI, GCP Vertex AI, and NVIDIA NIM. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-16. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.