GPT-5.2 Codex vs Grok 3 Mini
GPT-5.2 Codex (2025) and Grok 3 Mini (2025) are agentic coding models from OpenAI and xAI. GPT-5.2 Codex ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Grok 3 Mini ships a 131k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.
GPT-5.2 Codex is safer overall; choose Grok 3 Mini when provider fit matters.
Specs
| Released | 2025-12-18 | 2025-02-17 |
| Context window | — | 131k |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| GPT-5.2 Codex | Grok 3 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.3/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $0.5/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| GPT-5.2 Codex | Grok 3 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ||
| Multimodal | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Function calling | ||
| Tool use | ||
| Structured outputs | ||
| Code execution |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: GPT-5.2 Codex, reasoning mode: GPT-5.2 Codex, function calling: GPT-5.2 Codex, tool use: GPT-5.2 Codex, structured outputs: Grok 3 Mini, and code execution: GPT-5.2 Codex. Both models share multimodal input, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: GPT-5.2 Codex has no token price sourced yet and Grok 3 Mini has $0.3/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose GPT-5.2 Codex when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Grok 3 Mini when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Grok 3 Mini open source?
GPT-5.2 Codex is listed under Proprietary. Grok 3 Mini is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, GPT-5.2 Codex or Grok 3 Mini?
GPT-5.2 Codex has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, GPT-5.2 Codex or Grok 3 Mini?
Both GPT-5.2 Codex and Grok 3 Mini expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for reasoning mode, GPT-5.2 Codex or Grok 3 Mini?
GPT-5.2 Codex has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, GPT-5.2 Codex or Grok 3 Mini?
GPT-5.2 Codex has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run GPT-5.2 Codex and Grok 3 Mini?
GPT-5.2 Codex is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Grok 3 Mini is available on OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.