LLM Reference

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Qwen3-235B-A22B

GPT-5.2 Codex (2025) and Qwen3-235B-A22B (2025) are agentic coding models from OpenAI and Alibaba. GPT-5.2 Codex ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Qwen3-235B-A22B ships a 128K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.

GPT-5.2 Codex is safer overall; choose Qwen3-235B-A22B when provider fit matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGPT-5.2 CodexQwen3-235B-A22B
Decision fitCoding, Agents, and VisionCoding, RAG, and Long context
Context window128K
Cheapest output-$1.2/1M tokens
Provider routes0 tracked4 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose GPT-5.2 Codex when...
  • GPT-5.2 Codex uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags GPT-5.2 Codex for Coding, Agents, and Vision.
Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B when...
  • Qwen3-235B-A22B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Qwen3-235B-A22B has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Qwen3-235B-A22B uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Qwen3-235B-A22B for Coding, RAG, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

GPT-5.2 Codex

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Qwen3-235B-A22B

$620

Cheapest tracked route: AWS Bedrock

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

GPT-5.2 Codex -> Qwen3-235B-A22B
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen3-235B-A22B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
  • Qwen3-235B-A22B adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
Qwen3-235B-A22B -> GPT-5.2 Codex
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Qwen3-235B-A22B and GPT-5.2 Codex; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-12-182025-04-29
Context window128K
Parameters235B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Knowledge cutoff2025-08-

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGPT-5.2 CodexQwen3-235B-A22B
Input price-$0.4/1M tokens
Output price-$1.2/1M tokens
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-5.2 CodexQwen3-235B-A22B
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingYesNo
Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionYesNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: GPT-5.2 Codex, multimodal input: GPT-5.2 Codex, reasoning mode: GPT-5.2 Codex, function calling: GPT-5.2 Codex, tool use: GPT-5.2 Codex, structured outputs: Qwen3-235B-A22B, and code execution: GPT-5.2 Codex. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: GPT-5.2 Codex has no token price sourced yet and Qwen3-235B-A22B has $0.4/1M input tokens. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 4. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose GPT-5.2 Codex when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3-235B-A22B open source?

GPT-5.2 Codex is listed under Proprietary. Qwen3-235B-A22B is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3-235B-A22B?

GPT-5.2 Codex has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.

Which is better for multimodal input, GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3-235B-A22B?

GPT-5.2 Codex has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for reasoning mode, GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3-235B-A22B?

GPT-5.2 Codex has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3-235B-A22B?

GPT-5.2 Codex has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen3-235B-A22B?

GPT-5.2 Codex is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Qwen3-235B-A22B is available on Fireworks AI, AWS Bedrock, OpenRouter, and Venice AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-20. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.