GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
GPT-5.4 Pro (2026) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview (2026) are frontier-tier reasoning models from OpenAI and Alibaba. GPT-5.4 Pro ships a 1.05m-token context window, while Qwen3.6 Max Preview ships a 256k-token context window. On pricing, GPT-5.4 Pro ranges from $30 to $60/1M input tokens by tier; Qwen3.6 Max Preview ranges from $1.30 to $2/1M input tokens by tier. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
GPT-5.4 Pro fits 4x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Qwen3.6 Max Preview for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1.05m | 256k |
| Cheapest output | $180/1M tokens | $6.24/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 3 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- GPT-5.4 Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- GPT-5.4 Pro uniquely exposes Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags GPT-5.4 Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $6.24/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Qwen3.6 Max Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
GPT-5.4 Pro
$69,000
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
$2,392
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $66,608. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview is $174/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Code execution before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GPT-5.4 Pro is $174/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- GPT-5.4 Pro adds Code execution in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-03-01 | 2026-04-20 |
| Context window | 1.05m | 256k |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-08 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
|
|
| Output price |
|
|
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on code execution: GPT-5.4 Pro. Both models share vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, and function calling, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, GPT-5.4 Pro lists tiered pricing: 0-272,000t is $30/1M input and $180/1M output; 272,000t+ is $60/1M input and $270/1M output, while Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists tiered pricing: 0-128,000t is $1.30/1M input and $7.80/1M output; 128,000t+ is $2/1M input and $12/1M output. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Qwen3.6 Max Preview lower by about $72.40 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 3 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose GPT-5.4 Pro when coding workflow support and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Qwen3.6 Max Preview when vision-heavy evaluation and lower cheapest-tier input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
GPT-5.4 Pro supports 1.05m tokens, while Qwen3.6 Max Preview supports 256k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
GPT-5.4 Pro lists tiered pricing: 0-272,000t is $30/1M input and $180/1M output; 272,000t+ is $60/1M input and $270/1M output. Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists tiered pricing: 0-128,000t is $1.30/1M input and $7.80/1M output; 128,000t+ is $2/1M input and $12/1M output. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview open source?
GPT-5.4 Pro is listed under Proprietary. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Both GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.6 Max Preview expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Both GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.6 Max Preview expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
GPT-5.4 Pro is available on OpenRouter, OpenAI API, and Vercel AI Gateway. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is available on OpenRouter, Alibaba Cloud PAI-EAS, and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.