Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (2025) and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from IBM Research and Stockmark. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ships a 128K-token context window, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 32K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct fits 4x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | tool-calling agents and provider-routed production | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | RAG, Agents, and Long context | General |
| Context window | 128K | 32K |
| Cheapest output | $0.25/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Granite 3.3 8B Instruct for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
- Use Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
$86.50
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Replicate API
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Check replacement coverage for JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct adds JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-03-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 128K | 32K |
| Parameters | 8B | 100B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Open source | Open source |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Permitted | Permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-04 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.03/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $0.25/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on JSON / Tool use: Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and JSON / Tool use: Granite 3.3 8B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has $0.03/1M input tokens and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct supports 32K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct open source?
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is listed under Apache 2.0. Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for JSON / Tool use, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has the clearer documented JSON / Tool use signal in this comparison. If JSON / Tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for JSON / Tool use, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has the clearer documented JSON / Tool use signal in this comparison. If JSON / Tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available on NVIDIA NIM and Replicate API. Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is available on NVIDIA NIM. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Granite 3.3 8B Instruct over Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct fits 4x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for tighter calls. If your workload also depends on long-context analysis, start with Granite 3.3 8B Instruct; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Stockmark 2 100B Instruct.
Continue comparing
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 13B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Trinity-Large-Preview
- GPT-4 vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-10-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.