Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (2025) and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from IBM Research and Stockmark. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is safer overall; choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | tool-calling agents and provider-routed production | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | RAG, Agents, and Long context | Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $0.25/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Granite 3.3 8B Instruct for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
- Local decision data tags Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
$86.50
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Replicate API
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Check replacement coverage for JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct adds JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-03-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Parameters | 8B | 100B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | Open Weights |
| Openness | Open source | Open weights |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | - |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-04 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.03/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $0.25/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Granite 3.1 8B Instruct vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 13B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Trinity-Large-Preview
- GPT-4 vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.