LLM Reference

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning vs Qwen3-105B

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning (2025) and Qwen3-105B (2025) are frontier reasoning models from xAI and Alibaba. Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ships a 2M-token context window, while Qwen3-105B ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning fits 16x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Qwen3-105B for tighter calls.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGrok 4 Fast ReasoningQwen3-105B
Decision fitLong context and VisionRAG, Agents, and Long context
Context window2M128k
Cheapest output$2.5/1M tokens-
Provider routes2 tracked0 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Grok 4 Fast Reasoning when...
  • Grok 4 Fast Reasoning has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Grok 4 Fast Reasoning has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Grok 4 Fast Reasoning uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Grok 4 Fast Reasoning for Long context and Vision.
Choose Qwen3-105B when...
  • Qwen3-105B uniquely exposes Function calling and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Qwen3-105B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning

$1,625

Cheapest tracked route: xAI Console

Qwen3-105B

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning -> Qwen3-105B
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok 4 Fast Reasoning and Qwen3-105B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
  • Qwen3-105B adds Function calling and Tool use in local capability data.
Qwen3-105B -> Grok 4 Fast Reasoning
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Qwen3-105B and Grok 4 Fast Reasoning; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Function calling and Tool use before moving production traffic.
  • Grok 4 Fast Reasoning adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-09-012025-12-15
Context window2M128k
Parameters105B
Architecturedecoder only-
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
Knowledge cutoff-2025-02

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGrok 4 Fast ReasoningQwen3-105B
Input price$1.25/1M tokens-
Output price$2.5/1M tokens-
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityGrok 4 Fast ReasoningQwen3-105B
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsNoNo
Code executionNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Grok 4 Fast Reasoning, multimodal input: Grok 4 Fast Reasoning, reasoning mode: Grok 4 Fast Reasoning, function calling: Qwen3-105B, and tool use: Qwen3-105B. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Grok 4 Fast Reasoning has $1.25/1M input tokens and Qwen3-105B has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Grok 4 Fast Reasoning when reasoning depth, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Qwen3-105B when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4 Fast Reasoning or Qwen3-105B?

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning supports 2M tokens, while Qwen3-105B supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Grok 4 Fast Reasoning or Qwen3-105B open source?

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning is listed under Proprietary. Qwen3-105B is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Grok 4 Fast Reasoning or Qwen3-105B?

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Grok 4 Fast Reasoning or Qwen3-105B?

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Grok 4 Fast Reasoning or Qwen3-105B?

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Grok 4 Fast Reasoning and Qwen3-105B?

Grok 4 Fast Reasoning is available on Microsoft Foundry and xAI Console. Qwen3-105B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-20. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.