LLM Reference

Grok 4.3 vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Grok 4.3 (2026) and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct (2025) are frontier reasoning models from xAI and AI at Meta. Grok 4.3 ships a 1m-token context window, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. On pricing, Grok 4.3 ranges from $1.25 to $2.50/1M input tokens by tier; Llama 3.2 90B Instruct costs $1.35/1M input tokens. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Grok 4.3 fits 8x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct for tighter calls.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGrok 4.3Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Best forreasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agentsmultimodal apps
Decision fitRAG, Agents, and Long contextRAG, Long context, and Vision
Context window1m128k
Cheapest output$2.50/1M tokens$1.80/1M tokens
Provider routes4 tracked1 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Grok 4.3 when...
  • Grok 4.3 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Grok 4.3 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Grok 4.3 uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Grok 4.3 for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
Choose Llama 3.2 90B Instruct when...
  • Llama 3.2 90B Instruct has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.80/1M tokens.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 3.2 90B Instruct for RAG, Long context, and Vision.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Grok 4.3

$1,625

Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

$1,530

Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock

Estimated monthly gap: $95.00. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Grok 4.3 -> Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok 4.3 and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $0.70/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct -> Grok 4.3
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Grok 4.3; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Grok 4.3 is $0.70/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Grok 4.3 adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-05-062025-09-01
Context window1m128k
Parameters~0.5T90B
Architecture--
LicenseProprietaryLlama 3 Community
OpennessProprietaryOpen weights
Commercial useCommercial use with conditionsCommercial use with conditions
Knowledge cutoff2024-112023-12

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGrok 4.3Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input price
0-200,001t
$1.25/1M tokens
200,001t+
$2.50/1M tokens
$1.35/1M tokens
Output price
0-200,001t
$2.50/1M tokens
200,001t+
$5/1M tokens
$1.80/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGrok 4.3Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
VisionYesYes
MultimodalYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingYesNo
Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsYesYes
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Grok 4.3, function calling: Grok 4.3, and tool use: Grok 4.3. Both models share vision, multimodal input, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Grok 4.3 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1.25/1M input and $2.50/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2.50/1M input and $5/1M output, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct lists $1.35/1M input and $1.80/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 3.2 90B Instruct lower by about $0.14 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 4 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Grok 4.3 when reasoning depth, larger context windows, and lower cheapest-tier input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Instruct when vision-heavy evaluation are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.3 or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

Grok 4.3 supports 1m tokens, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

Grok 4.3 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1.25/1M input and $2.50/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2.50/1M input and $5/1M output. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct lists $1.35/1M input and $1.80/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Grok 4.3 or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct open source?

Grok 4.3 is listed under Proprietary. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is listed under Llama 3 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Grok 4.3 or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

Both Grok 4.3 and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Which is better for multimodal input, Grok 4.3 or Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

Both Grok 4.3 and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.

Where can I run Grok 4.3 and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct?

Grok 4.3 is available on xAI Console, OpenRouter, Microsoft Foundry, and Vercel AI Gateway. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-04. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.