Grok 4.3 vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
Grok 4.3 (2026) and Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S (2026) are frontier reasoning models from xAI and Tencent AI Lab. Grok 4.3 ships a 1M-token context window, while Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S ships a 200k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.
Grok 4.3 fits 5x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Grok 4.3 | Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | RAG, Agents, and Long context | Long context |
| Context window | 1M | 200k |
| Cheapest output | $2.50/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 4 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Grok 4.3 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Grok 4.3 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Grok 4.3 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Grok 4.3 for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
- Local decision data tags Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Grok 4.3
$1,625
Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console
Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok 4.3 and Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S and Grok 4.3; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Grok 4.3 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-05-06 | 2026-01-10 |
| Context window | 1M | 200k |
| Parameters | ~0.5T | — |
| Architecture | - | - |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-11 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Grok 4.3 | Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| - |
| Output price |
| - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Grok 4.3 | Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Grok 4.3, multimodal input: Grok 4.3, reasoning mode: Grok 4.3, function calling: Grok 4.3, tool use: Grok 4.3, and structured outputs: Grok 4.3. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Grok 4.3 has $1.25/1M input tokens and Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 4 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Grok 4.3 when reasoning depth, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.3 or Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S?
Grok 4.3 supports 1M tokens, while Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Grok 4.3 or Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S open source?
Grok 4.3 is listed under Proprietary. Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Grok 4.3 or Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S?
Grok 4.3 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Grok 4.3 or Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S?
Grok 4.3 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for reasoning mode, Grok 4.3 or Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S?
Grok 4.3 has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Grok 4.3 and Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S?
Grok 4.3 is available on xAI Console, OpenRouter, Microsoft Foundry, and Vercel AI Gateway. Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.