Grok Build 0.1 vs Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed
Grok Build 0.1 (2026) and Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed (2026) are agentic coding models from xAI and Moonshot AI. Grok Build 0.1 ships a 256k-token context window, while Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed ships a 262k-token context window. On pricing, Grok Build 0.1 ranges from $1 to $2/1M input tokens by tier; Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed costs $1.90/1M input tokens. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed is safer overall; choose Grok Build 0.1 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 256k | 262k |
| Cheapest output | $2/1M tokens | $8/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 3 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Grok Build 0.1 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2/1M tokens.
- Grok Build 0.1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Grok Build 0.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Grok Build 0.1
$1,300
Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console
Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed
$3,520
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Moonshot AI Kimi
Estimated monthly gap: $2,220. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Grok Build 0.1 and Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed is $6/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed and Grok Build 0.1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Grok Build 0.1 is $6/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-05-14 | 2026-06-15 |
| Context window | 256k | 262k |
| Parameters | — | 1T |
| Architecture | - | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $1.90/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $8/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint is close: both models cover vision, multimodal input, reasoning mode, function calling, and tool use. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
For cost, Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output, while Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed lists $1.90/1M input and $8/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Grok Build 0.1 lower by about $2.43 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 3 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when coding workflow support, lower cheapest-tier input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed when coding workflow support and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed?
Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed supports 262k tokens, while Grok Build 0.1 supports 256k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed?
Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output. Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed lists $1.90/1M input and $8/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed open source?
Grok Build 0.1 is listed under Proprietary. Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed?
Both Grok Build 0.1 and Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed?
Both Grok Build 0.1 and Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Grok Build 0.1 and Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed?
Grok Build 0.1 is available on xAI Console, Vercel AI Gateway, and OpenRouter. Kimi K2.7-Code HighSpeed is available on Moonshot AI Kimi. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.