Grok Build 0.1 vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Grok Build 0.1 (2026) and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Grok Build 0.1 ships a 256k-token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo ships a 262k-token context window. On pricing, Grok Build 0.1 ranges from $1 to $2/1M input tokens by tier; Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo costs $1.15/1M input tokens. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Grok Build 0.1 is coding-specialized model, while Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Long context |
| Context window | 256k | 262k |
| Cheapest output | $2/1M tokens | $8/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 3 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Grok Build 0.1 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2/1M tokens.
- Grok Build 0.1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Grok Build 0.1 uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Grok Build 0.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Grok Build 0.1
$1,300
Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
$2,920
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Vercel AI Gateway
Estimated monthly gap: $1,620. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is $6/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Grok Build 0.1 is $6/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Grok Build 0.1 adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-05-14 | 2025-11-06 |
| Context window | 256k | 262k |
| Parameters | — | 1T (32B active) |
| Architecture | - | - |
| License | Proprietary | MIT(OSI) |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use allowed |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $1.15/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $8/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Grok Build 0.1 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Grok Build 0.1, multimodal input: Grok Build 0.1, reasoning mode: Grok Build 0.1, function calling: Grok Build 0.1, tool use: Grok Build 0.1, and structured outputs: Grok Build 0.1. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output, while Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo lists $1.15/1M input and $8/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Grok Build 0.1 lower by about $1.91 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 3 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when coding workflow support, lower cheapest-tier input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo when long-context analysis and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo supports 262k tokens, while Grok Build 0.1 supports 256k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo lists $1.15/1M input and $8/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo open source?
Grok Build 0.1 is listed under Proprietary. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Grok Build 0.1 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Grok Build 0.1 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Grok Build 0.1 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Grok Build 0.1 is available on xAI Console, Vercel AI Gateway, and OpenRouter. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is available on Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-06. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.