Grok Build 0.1 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct
Grok Build 0.1 (2026) and Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Grok Build 0.1 ships a 256k-token context window, while Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct ships a 10m-token context window. On pricing, Grok Build 0.1 ranges from $1 to $2/1M input tokens by tier; Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct costs $0.08/1M input tokens. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.
Treat this as a product-type comparison: Grok Build 0.1 is coding-specialized model, while Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Coding-specialized model | Standalone API model |
| Best for | custom coding agents, code generation, and tool loops | multimodal apps, long-context analysis, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 256k | 10m |
| Cheapest output | $2/1M tokens | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 3 tracked | 12 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Grok Build 0.1 uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Grok Build 0.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.30/1M tokens.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Grok Build 0.1
$1,300
Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console
Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct
$139
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Estimated monthly gap: $1,161. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct is $1.70/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Grok Build 0.1 is $1.70/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Grok Build 0.1 adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-05-14 | 2025-04-05 |
| Context window | 256k | 10m |
| Parameters | — | 109B (17B active) |
| Architecture | - | mixture of experts |
| License | Proprietary | Llama 4 Community |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Commercial use | Commercial use with conditions | Commercial use with conditions |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2024-08 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $0.08/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $0.30/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Grok Build 0.1, function calling: Grok Build 0.1, and tool use: Grok Build 0.1. Both models share vision, multimodal input, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output, while Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct lists $0.08/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct lower by about $1.15 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 3 providers versus 12, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when coding workflow support are central to the workload. Choose Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Grok Build 0.1 or Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct?
Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct supports 10m tokens, while Grok Build 0.1 supports 256k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct?
Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output. Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct lists $0.08/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct open source?
Grok Build 0.1 is listed under Proprietary. Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct is listed under Llama 4 Community. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Grok Build 0.1 or Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct?
Both Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Grok Build 0.1 or Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct?
Both Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct?
Grok Build 0.1 is available on xAI Console, Vercel AI Gateway, and OpenRouter. Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct is available on Cloudflare Workers AI, OpenRouter, Together AI, Fireworks AI, and DeepInfra. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-07. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.