LLM Reference

Grok Build 0.1 vs Mistral Magistral Small 2509

Grok Build 0.1 (2026) and Mistral Magistral Small 2509 (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Grok Build 0.1 ships a 256K-token context window, while Mistral Magistral Small 2509 ships a not-yet-sourced context window. On pricing, Grok Build 0.1 ranges from $1 to $2/1M input tokens by tier; Mistral Magistral Small 2509 costs $0.50/1M input tokens. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: Grok Build 0.1 is coding-specialized model, while Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalGrok Build 0.1Mistral Magistral Small 2509
Product typeCoding-specialized modelStandalone API model
Best forcustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loopsprovider-routed production
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsGeneral
Context window256K
Cheapest output$2/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Provider routes3 tracked2 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Grok Build 0.1 when...
  • Grok Build 0.1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Grok Build 0.1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Grok Build 0.1 uniquely exposes Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Grok Build 0.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Mistral Magistral Small 2509 when...
  • Mistral Magistral Small 2509 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $1.50/1M tokens.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Mistral Magistral Small 2509

Grok Build 0.1

$1,300

Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console

Mistral Magistral Small 2509

$775

Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock

Estimated monthly gap: $525. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Grok Build 0.1 -> Mistral Magistral Small 2509
  • Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is $0.50/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 -> Grok Build 0.1
  • Provider overlap exists on Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is $0.50/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Grok Build 0.1 adds Reasoning, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-05-142025-09-01
Context window256K
Parameters24B
Architecture--
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeGrok Build 0.1Mistral Magistral Small 2509
Input price
0-200,001t
$1/1M tokens
200,001t+
$2/1M tokens
$0.50/1M tokens
Output price
0-200,001t
$2/1M tokens
200,001t+
$4/1M tokens
$1.50/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityGrok Build 0.1Mistral Magistral Small 2509
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingYesNo
Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsYesNo
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Grok Build 0.1, function calling: Grok Build 0.1, tool use: Grok Build 0.1, and structured outputs: Grok Build 0.1. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output, while Mistral Magistral Small 2509 lists $0.50/1M input and $1.50/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Mistral Magistral Small 2509 lower by about $0.50 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 3 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Grok Build 0.1 when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Mistral Magistral Small 2509 when provider fit and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Magistral Small 2509?

Grok Build 0.1 lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $1/1M input and $2/1M output; 200,001t+ is $2/1M input and $4/1M output. Mistral Magistral Small 2509 lists $0.50/1M input and $1.50/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Magistral Small 2509 open source?

Grok Build 0.1 is listed under Proprietary. Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Magistral Small 2509?

Grok Build 0.1 has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Magistral Small 2509?

Grok Build 0.1 has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for tool use, Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Magistral Small 2509?

Grok Build 0.1 has the clearer documented tool use signal in this comparison. If tool use is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Grok Build 0.1 and Mistral Magistral Small 2509?

Grok Build 0.1 is available on xAI Console, Vercel AI Gateway, and OpenRouter. Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is available on AWS Bedrock and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-25. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.