LLM Reference

Kimi K2.7-Code vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

Kimi K2.7-Code (2026) and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo (2025) compare a coding-specialized model against a standalone API model. Kimi K2.7-Code ships a 262k-token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo ships a 262k-token context window. On pricing, Kimi K2.7-Code costs $0.95/1M input tokens versus $1.15/1M for the alternative. This page treats the result as workflow and deployment fit, not a universal model winner.

Treat this as a product-type comparison: Kimi K2.7-Code is coding-specialized model, while Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is standalone API model. Choose based on workflow fit before reading any benchmark or price row as decisive.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalKimi K2.7-CodeKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Product typeCoding-specialized modelStandalone API model
Best forcustom coding agents, code generation, and tool loopsgeneral production evaluation
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsLong context
Context window262k262k
Cheapest output$4/1M tokens$8/1M tokens
Provider routes1 tracked1 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Kimi K2.7-Code when...
  • Kimi K2.7-Code has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $4/1M tokens.
  • Kimi K2.7-Code uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Kimi K2.7-Code for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo when...
  • Local decision data tags Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo for Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Lower estimate Kimi K2.7-Code

Kimi K2.7-Code

$1,760

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Moonshot AI Kimi

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

$2,920

Cheapest tracked route/tier: Vercel AI Gateway

Estimated monthly gap: $1,160. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Kimi K2.7-Code -> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Kimi K2.7-Code and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is $4/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning before moving production traffic.
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo -> Kimi K2.7-Code
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Kimi K2.7-Code; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Kimi K2.7-Code is $4/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Kimi K2.7-Code adds Vision, Multimodal, and Reasoning in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2026-06-122025-11-06
Context window262k262k
Parameters1T1T (32B active)
ArchitectureMixture of Experts-
LicenseMITOSI-approvedMITOSI-approved
OpennessOpen sourceOpen source
Commercial useCommercial use: permittedCommercial use: permitted
Knowledge cutoff--

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeKimi K2.7-CodeKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Input price$0.95/1M tokens$1.15/1M tokens
Output price$4/1M tokens$8/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityKimi K2.7-CodeKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Function callingYesNo
Tool useYesNo
Structured outputsYesNo
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Kimi K2.7-Code, multimodal input: Kimi K2.7-Code, reasoning mode: Kimi K2.7-Code, function calling: Kimi K2.7-Code, tool use: Kimi K2.7-Code, and structured outputs: Kimi K2.7-Code. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Kimi K2.7-Code lists $0.95/1M input and $4/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo lists $1.15/1M input and $8/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Kimi K2.7-Code lower by about $1.34 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 1, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Kimi K2.7-Code when coding workflow support and lower input-token cost are central to the workload. Choose Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.7-Code or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2.7-Code supports 262k tokens, while Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo supports 262k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7-Code or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2.7-Code is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Kimi K2.7-Code costs $0.95/1M input and $4/1M output tokens. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo costs $1.15/1M input and $8/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Kimi K2.7-Code or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo open source?

Kimi K2.7-Code is listed under MIT. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Kimi K2.7-Code or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2.7-Code has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.

Which is better for multimodal input, Kimi K2.7-Code or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2.7-Code has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Kimi K2.7-Code and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2.7-Code is available on Moonshot AI Kimi. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is available on Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-20. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.