Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (2025) and Seed-OSS 36B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and ByteDance. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 ships a 4k-token context window, while Seed-OSS 36B Instruct ships a 4k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Seed-OSS 36B Instruct is safer overall; choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | General |
| Context window | 4k | 4k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Use Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
- Use Seed-OSS 36B Instruct when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-04-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 4k | 4k |
| Parameters | 4B | 36B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Llama 3 Community | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open weights | Proprietary |
| Weights | Unknown | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2024-10 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 vs GPT-4
Popular comparisons for Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-07-10. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.