LLM Reference

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Marin 32B Base

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (2025) and Marin 32B Base (2025) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and Marin. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 ships a 128k-token context window, while Marin 32B Base ships a 4k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 fits 31x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Marin 32B Base for tighter calls.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Marin 32B Base
Best forgeneral production evaluationgeneral production evaluation
Decision fitLong contextGeneral
Context window128k4k
Cheapest output--
Provider routes1 tracked0 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 shared0 shared

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 when...
  • Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for Long context.
Choose Marin 32B Base when...
  • Use Marin 32B Base when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Marin 32B Base

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 -> Marin 32B Base
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Marin 32B Base; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Marin 32B Base -> Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Marin 32B Base and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-06-012025-10-25
Context window128k4k
Parameters49B32.5B
ArchitectureDecoder OnlyDecoder Only
LicenseNVIDIA Open ModelApache 2.0OSI-approved
OpennessOpen weightsOpen source
Commercial useCommercial use: permittedCommercial use: permitted
Knowledge cutoff-2024-07

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Marin 32B Base
Input price--
Output price--
Providers-

Pricing not yet sourced for either model.

Capabilities

CapabilityLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Marin 32B Base
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsNoNo
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint is close: both models cover the core production surface. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has no token price sourced yet and Marin 32B Base has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 1 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Marin 32B Base when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Marin 32B Base?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports 128k tokens, while Marin 32B Base supports 4k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Marin 32B Base open source?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is listed under NVIDIA Open Model. Marin 32B Base is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Where can I run Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Marin 32B Base?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is available on NVIDIA NIM. Marin 32B Base is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

When should I pick Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 over Marin 32B Base?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 fits 31x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Marin 32B Base for tighter calls. If your workload also depends on long-context analysis, start with Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Marin 32B Base.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.