Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (2025) and Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S (2026) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and Tencent AI Lab. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 ships a 128k-token context window, while Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S ships a 200k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S is safer overall; choose Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Long context | Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 200k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for Long context.
- Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S and Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-06-01 | 2026-01-10 |
| Context window | 128k | 200k |
| Parameters | 49B | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | - |
| License | NVIDIA Open Model | Tencent Hunyuan Community License |
| Openness | Open weights | Open weights |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 | Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Mistral Nemotron
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Reward vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
- o3 vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- DeepSeek V3 vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
- DeepSeek R1 vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
- DeepSeek V3.1 vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Llama 3.1 NemoGuard 8B Content Safety
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Popular comparisons for Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.