LLM Reference

Llama Guard 3 1B vs Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2

Llama Guard 3 1B (2024) and Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 (2025) are compact production models from AI at Meta and NVIDIA AI. Llama Guard 3 1B ships a 128K-token context window, while Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 ships a not-yet-sourced context window. On pricing, Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 costs $0.04/1M input tokens versus $0.1/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.

Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is ~150% cheaper at $0.04/1M; pay for Llama Guard 3 1B only for provider fit.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalLlama Guard 3 1BNemotron-Nano-9B-v2
Decision fitLong context and ClassificationClassification and JSON / Tool use
Context window128K
Cheapest output$0.1/1M tokens$0.16/1M tokens
Provider routes1 tracked2 tracked
Shared benchmarks0 rows0 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Llama Guard 3 1B when...
  • Llama Guard 3 1B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
  • Llama Guard 3 1B has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.1/1M tokens.
  • Local decision data tags Llama Guard 3 1B for Long context and Classification.
Choose Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 when...
  • Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 uniquely exposes Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 for Classification and JSON / Tool use.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.

Lower estimate Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2

Llama Guard 3 1B

$105

Cheapest tracked route: Fireworks AI

Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2

$72.00

Cheapest tracked route: OpenRouter

Estimated monthly gap: $33.00. Batch, cache, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.

Switch friction

Llama Guard 3 1B -> Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Llama Guard 3 1B and Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is $0.06/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
  • Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 adds Structured outputs in local capability data.
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 -> Llama Guard 3 1B
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 and Llama Guard 3 1B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Llama Guard 3 1B is $0.06/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
  • Check replacement coverage for Structured outputs before moving production traffic.

Specs

Specification
Released2024-09-252025-08-18
Context window128K
Parameters1B9B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseOpen SourceUnknown
Knowledge cutoff2023-122025-03

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeLlama Guard 3 1BNemotron-Nano-9B-v2
Input price$0.1/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output price$0.1/1M tokens$0.16/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

CapabilityLlama Guard 3 1BNemotron-Nano-9B-v2
VisionNoNo
MultimodalNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsNoYes
Code executionNoNo

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on structured outputs: Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Llama Guard 3 1B lists $0.1/1M input and $0.1/1M output tokens, while Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 lists $0.04/1M input and $0.16/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 lower by about $0.02 per million blended tokens. Availability is 1 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Llama Guard 3 1B when provider fit are central to the workload. Choose Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 when provider fit, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 3 1B or Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2?

Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Llama Guard 3 1B costs $0.1/1M input and $0.1/1M output tokens. Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 costs $0.04/1M input and $0.16/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Llama Guard 3 1B or Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 open source?

Llama Guard 3 1B is listed under Open Source. Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is listed under Unknown. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for structured outputs, Llama Guard 3 1B or Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2?

Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Llama Guard 3 1B and Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2?

Llama Guard 3 1B is available on Fireworks AI. Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is available on NVIDIA NIM and OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.

When should I pick Llama Guard 3 1B over Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2?

Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is ~150% cheaper at $0.04/1M; pay for Llama Guard 3 1B only for provider fit. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Llama Guard 3 1B; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-05-19. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.