Mistral Magistral Small 2509 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 (2025) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (2024) are compact production models from MistralAI and NVIDIA AI. Mistral Magistral Small 2509 ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Nemotron 3 Ultra ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is safer overall; choose Nemotron 3 Ultra when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Mistral Magistral Small 2509 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | provider-routed production | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | Long context |
| Context window | — | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $1.50/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Mistral Magistral Small 2509 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Nemotron 3 Ultra for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Mistral Magistral Small 2509
$775
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Nemotron 3 Ultra
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Magistral Small 2509 and Nemotron 3 Ultra; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Mistral Magistral Small 2509; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-09-01 | 2024-09-10 |
| Context window | — | 128k |
| Parameters | 24B | 550B (55B active) |
| Architecture | - | decoder only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Mistral Magistral Small 2509 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.50/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $1.50/1M tokens | - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Magistral Small 2509 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint is close: both models cover the core production surface. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Mistral Magistral Small 2509 has $0.50/1M input tokens and Nemotron 3 Ultra has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Mistral Magistral Small 2509 when provider fit and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Is Mistral Magistral Small 2509 or Nemotron 3 Ultra open source?
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is listed under Proprietary. Nemotron 3 Ultra is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Where can I run Mistral Magistral Small 2509 and Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is available on AWS Bedrock and Vercel AI Gateway. Nemotron 3 Ultra is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Mistral Magistral Small 2509 over Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 is safer overall; choose Nemotron 3 Ultra when provider fit matters. If your workload also depends on provider fit, start with Mistral Magistral Small 2509; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Nemotron 3 Ultra.
What is the main difference between Mistral Magistral Small 2509 and Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 and Nemotron 3 Ultra differ most on context, provider coverage, capabilities, or pricing depending on the data currently sourced. Use the specs table first, then validate the model behavior with your own prompts.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-22. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.