Mistral Magistral Small 2509 vs Sarvam 30B
Mistral Magistral Small 2509 (2025) and Sarvam 30B (2026) are compact production models from MistralAI and Sarvam.ai. Mistral Magistral Small 2509 ships a not-yet-sourced context window, while Sarvam 30B ships a 66k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Sarvam 30B is safer overall; choose Mistral Magistral Small 2509 when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Mistral Magistral Small 2509 | Sarvam 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | provider-routed production | tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | General | Agents and JSON / Tool use |
| Context window | — | 66k |
| Cheapest output | $1.50/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Mistral Magistral Small 2509 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Sarvam 30B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Sarvam 30B uniquely exposes JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Sarvam 30B for Agents and JSON / Tool use.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Mistral Magistral Small 2509
$775
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Sarvam 30B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Magistral Small 2509 and Sarvam 30B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Sarvam 30B adds JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Sarvam 30B and Mistral Magistral Small 2509; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-09-01 | 2026-03-22 |
| Context window | — | 66k |
| Parameters | 24B | 30B (2.4B active) |
| Architecture | - | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | Apache 2.0OSI-approved |
| Openness | Open source | Open source |
| Weights | Unknown | Available |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2025-06 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Mistral Magistral Small 2509 | Sarvam 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.50/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $1.50/1M tokens | - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Magistral Small 2509 | Sarvam 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Mistral Magistral Small 2509 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
- Mistral Magistral Small 2509 vs Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
- GPT-5.4-Cyber vs Mistral Magistral Small 2509
- Claude Instant vs Sarvam 30B
- Magistral Small 2506 vs Mistral Magistral Small 2509
- Grok 4.3 vs Mistral Magistral Small 2509
- Kimi K2.6 vs Mistral Magistral Small 2509
Popular comparisons for Mistral Magistral Small 2509
Popular comparisons for Sarvam 30B
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.