Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs TxGemma
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B (2026) and TxGemma (2024) are frontier reasoning models from Alibaba and Google DeepMind. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B ships a 262k-token context window, while TxGemma ships a not-yet-sourced context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B is safer overall; choose TxGemma when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B | TxGemma |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps and tool-calling agents | tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | RAG, Agents, and Long context | Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use |
| Context window | 262k | — |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.
- TxGemma has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- TxGemma uniquely exposes Function calling and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags TxGemma for Agents, Classification, and JSON / Tool use.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
TxGemma
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B and TxGemma; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
- TxGemma adds Function calling and Structured outputs in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for TxGemma and Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Function calling and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-06-25 | 2024-06-01 |
| Context window | 262k | — |
| Parameters | 35B total, 3B active | 2B |
| Architecture | Mixture of Experts | Decoder Only |
| License | Apache 2.0OSI-approved | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open source | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B | TxGemma |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers | - |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B | TxGemma |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | No | Yes |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B, function calling: TxGemma, and structured outputs: TxGemma. Both models share tool use, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B has no token price sourced yet and TxGemma has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 0 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B when reasoning depth are central to the workload. Choose TxGemma when provider fit and broader provider choice are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Is Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B or TxGemma open source?
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B is listed under Apache 2.0. TxGemma is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for reasoning mode, Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B or TxGemma?
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B or TxGemma?
TxGemma has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for tool use, Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B or TxGemma?
Both Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B and TxGemma expose tool use. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for structured outputs, Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B or TxGemma?
TxGemma has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B and TxGemma?
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. TxGemma is available on GCP Vertex AI. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-25. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.