Stockmark 2 100B Instruct vs Teuken 7B Instruct
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) and Teuken 7B Instruct (2024) are compact production models from Stockmark and OpenGPT-X. Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 128K-token context window, while Teuken 7B Instruct ships a 4K-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing. The goal is to make the tradeoff clear before deeper testing.
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct fits 32x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Teuken 7B Instruct for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct | Teuken 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fit | Long context | General |
| Context window | 128K | 4K |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 rows | 0 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Stockmark 2 100B Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for Long context.
- Use Teuken 7B Instruct when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output prices on this page.
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Teuken 7B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-06-01 | 2024-10-01 |
| Context window | 128K | 4K |
| Parameters | 100B | 7B |
| Architecture | decoder only | decoder only |
| License | 1 | 1 |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct | Teuken 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct | Teuken 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint is close: both models cover the core production surface. That makes context budget, benchmark fit, and provider maturity more important than a simple checklist. If your application depends on one integration detail, verify it against the provider route you plan to use, not just the base model listing.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Stockmark 2 100B Instruct has no token price sourced yet and Teuken 7B Instruct has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 1 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when long-context analysis and larger context windows are central to the workload. Choose Teuken 7B Instruct when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency. For teams standardizing a stack, that distinction is often the difference between a benchmark win and a reliable deployment.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Stockmark 2 100B Instruct or Teuken 7B Instruct?
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct supports 128K tokens, while Teuken 7B Instruct supports 4K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Stockmark 2 100B Instruct or Teuken 7B Instruct open source?
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is listed under 1. Teuken 7B Instruct is listed under 1. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Where can I run Stockmark 2 100B Instruct and Teuken 7B Instruct?
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is available on NVIDIA NIM. Teuken 7B Instruct is available on NVIDIA NIM. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
When should I pick Stockmark 2 100B Instruct over Teuken 7B Instruct?
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct fits 32x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Teuken 7B Instruct for tighter calls. If your workload also depends on long-context analysis, start with Stockmark 2 100B Instruct; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Teuken 7B Instruct.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-01. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.