activeVision
Blueprint-Bench 2
Metric: Accuracy (higher is better)Introduced: 2026
Spatial and visual reasoning benchmark for interpreting architectural or engineering blueprints.
Models ranked
2
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
38.6 – 36.2
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
—
need ≥2 snapshots
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Accuracy (higher is better).
#Model variant and provenanceRelative to leaderScore
1
Claude Fable 5
38.6Version: Blueprint-Bench 2Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 9, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
Notes: DAT-6106: Unstarred in Anthropic's shared Fable 5/Mythos 5 launch table, so this is a Claude Fable 5 score.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: Jun 15, 2026