SWE-bench Multimodal
A 517-issue extension of SWE-bench for visual software repositories. Tasks require resolving real GitHub issues where screenshots, plots, diagrams, or other visual evidence are part of the software-engineering context; model scores must preserve the evaluator and harness.
Models ranked
1
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
59.4 – 59.4
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
—
need ≥2 snapshots
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by % Resolved (higher is better).
Configuration: Claude Opus 5 standard configuration
Notes: Vendor-reported. Source: p.149, Table 8.1.A and Section 9.3. Do not compare this internal-harness row as identical to third-party runs.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: Jul 26, 2026