CharXiv
Chart understanding benchmark with descriptive and reasoning questions High benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick — weigh it against pricing, API availability, and release date.
Models ranked
1
tracked on this benchmark
Score band
84.8 – 84.8
best → lowest tracked
Snapshot trend
—
need ≥2 snapshots
Leaderboard
Tracked models ranked by Score (higher is better).
Notes: Model variant: Kimi K3 (max reasoning effort). Benchmark variant: CharXiv RQ, three-run mean. Harness/evaluator not disclosed by Moonshot. Source posture: Moonshot/Kimi self-reported launch table; confidence: medium because the value is vendor-reported and not independently reproduced. Recommended seed value: 84.8.
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and shortlisting — not for universal quality ranking. Prefer benchmarks closest to your workload, then validate the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.
Trust this score when
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Be cautious when
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
FAQ
What does the CharXiv benchmark measure?
Chart understanding benchmark with descriptive and reasoning questions On this page it lists 1 tracked model variant where higher is better.
Is a higher CharXiv score always better?
For this benchmark, higher is better. A high score helps you shortlist, but confirm pricing, context window, and provider availability on each model page before committing — the top scorer is not always the right pick for your workload or budget.
How current is this CharXiv data?
This benchmark was last reviewed on May 20, 2026. Re-check the linked model pages for the freshest provider and pricing detail.
Related benchmarks
Last reviewed: May 20, 2026