activeMultimodalTool use

Chartography w/ tools

Metric: Pass@1 (higher is better)Introduced: 2026

Chart understanding and reasoning benchmark evaluated with tool access. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash launch materials use the Claude Code harness with a 512k-token context window.

Models ranked

3

tracked on this benchmark

Score band

90.2 – 78.9

best → lowest tracked

Snapshot trend

+11.30

Sep 10 → Oct 23 · 1 models

Leaderboard

Tracked models ranked by Pass@1 (higher is better).

Compare candidates
#Model variant and provenanceScore
1
Version: ChartoGraphy w/ python; five-run mean; max reasoning effortHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Oct 23, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource

Notes: Moonshot self-reported launch table, row 'ChartoGraphy w/ python', column 'Kimi K3.1 Pro (max)'. Settings: reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95 (blog footnote).

90.2
2
Version: Chartography w/ toolsHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Oct 17, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
83.0
3
Version: Chartography w/ tools Pass@1; Claude Code harness; 512k contextHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Sep 10, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
78.9

How to read this benchmark

This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Use scores for directional filtering and shortlisting, not universal quality ranking; then validate pricing, context window, provider availability, and fit for your workload.

Trust this score when

  • There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
  • The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
  • Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.

Be cautious when

  • There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
  • The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
  • The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.

Related benchmarks

Last reviewed: Sep 10, 2026

Resources