Terminal-BenchactiveCoding
Terminal-Bench
Metric: Score (higher is better)
About
Measures ability to complete real-world terminal/CLI tasks autonomously
How to read this benchmark
This benchmark uses a scoring system where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and model shortlisting, not for universal quality ranking.
Interpretation checklist: prefer benchmarks that are closest to your workload style, then validate against the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.
Trust when:
- There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
- Model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
- Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.
Don't trust when:
- There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
- Benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
- The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.
Current modeled score band for tracked entries is roughly 76.2 – 43.2.
Window
May 14 to May 19
last 3 snapshots
Mean delta
+33.00
score points
Coverage
1
models in latest snapshot
Leaderboard preview (top 5)
- 1. Gemini 3.5 Flash76.2
- 2. Claude 4 Opus43.2