Aquila 2 34B vs Doubao Pro 256K
Aquila 2 34B (2023) and Doubao Pro 256K (2024) are compact production models from Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (BAAI) and ByteDance. Aquila 2 34B ships a 2k-token context window, while Doubao Pro 256K ships a 256k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Doubao Pro 256K fits 128x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Aquila 2 34B for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Aquila 2 34B | Doubao Pro 256K |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | Long context |
| Context window | 2k | 256k |
| Cheapest output | - | $1.32/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 0 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Use Aquila 2 34B when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
- Doubao Pro 256K has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Doubao Pro 256K has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Doubao Pro 256K for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Aquila 2 34B
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Doubao Pro 256K
$919
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Volcengine
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Aquila 2 34B and Doubao Pro 256K; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Doubao Pro 256K and Aquila 2 34B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-05-15 |
| Context window | 2k | 256k |
| Parameters | 34B | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Aquila 2 34B | Doubao Pro 256K |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | $0.73/1M tokens |
| Output price | - | $1.32/1M tokens |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Aquila 2 34B | Doubao Pro 256K |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Aquila 2 34B vs Mistral Nemotron
- Aquila Chat 2 70B Expressive vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
- Claude 1.3 vs Doubao Pro 256K
- Aquila 2 34B vs Hunyuan Hy3 Preview
- Aquila 2 34B vs Llama 2 7B Chat
- Aquila 2 34B vs Llama 3 Taiwan 70B Instruct
- Aquila 2 34B vs Llama 3 Swallow 70B Instruct
- Aquila 2 34B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Doubao Pro 256K vs Together AI - Llama 3 8B Lite
Popular comparisons for Aquila 2 34B
Popular comparisons for Doubao Pro 256K
Last reviewed: 2026-07-10. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.