Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024) and Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning (2025) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and Microsoft Research. Claude 3.5 Haiku ships a 200k-token context window, while Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning is safer overall; choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and provider-routed production | reasoning-heavy apps |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Long context |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $4/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude 3.5 Haiku has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku uniquely exposes Vision, Structured outputs, and Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude 3.5 Haiku for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Local decision data tags Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
$1,640
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Structured outputs, and Code execution before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning and Claude 3.5 Haiku; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku adds Vision, Structured outputs, and Code execution in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2025-12-01 |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 3.8B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2025-02 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.80/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $4/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for Claude 3.5 Haiku
Popular comparisons for Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B
- Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Gemma 2 9B SahabatAI Instruct
- Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs ByteDance Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro
- Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Llama 3 8B Instruct
- Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.