Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (2024) and Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Anthropic. Claude 3.7 Sonnet ships a 200k-token context window, while Claude 3.5 Haiku ships a 200k-token context window. On pricing, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input tokens versus $3/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is ~275% cheaper at $0.80/1M; pay for Claude 3.7 Sonnet only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 200k |
| Cheapest output | $15/1M tokens | $4/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 6 tracked | 6 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet uniquely exposes Multimodal and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude 3.7 Sonnet for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $4/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Claude 3.5 Haiku for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
$6,150
Cheapest tracked route/tier: GCP Vertex AI
Claude 3.5 Haiku
$1,640
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Estimated monthly gap: $4,510. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on Anthropic, OpenRouter, and AWS Bedrock; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku is $11/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Multimodal and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on GCP Vertex AI, Replicate API, and OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $11/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet adds Multimodal and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2024-03-04 | 2024-10-22 |
| Context window | 200k | 200k |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-11 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/1M tokens | $0.80/1M tokens |
| Output price | $15/1M tokens | $4/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3-Max
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.5
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.7
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Grok 4
Popular comparisons for Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Popular comparisons for Claude 3.5 Haiku
Last reviewed: 2026-07-26. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.