LLM ReferenceLLM Reference

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 0528

Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025) and DeepSeek R1 0528 (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and DeepSeek. Claude Haiku 4.5 ships a 200k-token context window, while DeepSeek R1 0528 ships a 160K-token context window. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.1/1M input tokens versus $0.8/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, provider availability, and production fit.

DeepSeek R1 0528 is ~700% cheaper at $0.1/1M; pay for Claude Haiku 4.5 only for coding workflow support.

Specs

Released2025-10-012025-01-01
Context window200k160K
Parameters671B
Architecturedecoder onlydecoder only
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
Knowledge cutoff2025-02-

Pricing and availability

Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek R1 0528
Input price$0.8/1M tokens$0.1/1M tokens
Output price$4/1M tokens$0.3/1M tokens
Providers

Capabilities

Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek R1 0528
Vision
Multimodal
Reasoning
Function calling
Tool use
Structured outputs
Code execution

Benchmarks

No shared benchmark rows are currently sourced for this pair.

Deep dive

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Claude Haiku 4.5, multimodal input: Claude Haiku 4.5, reasoning mode: DeepSeek R1 0528, function calling: Claude Haiku 4.5, and tool use: Claude Haiku 4.5. Both models share structured outputs and code execution, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

For cost, Claude Haiku 4.5 lists $0.8/1M input and $4/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek R1 0528 lists $0.1/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts DeepSeek R1 0528 lower by about $1.6 per million blended tokens. Availability is 8 providers versus 5, so concentration risk also matters.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 when coding workflow support and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200k tokens, while DeepSeek R1 0528 supports 160K tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528?

DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.8/1M input and $4/1M output tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.1/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528 open source?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is listed under Proprietary. DeepSeek R1 0528 is listed under Open Source. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available on Microsoft Foundry, Anthropic, Snowflake Cortex, AWS Bedrock, and GCP Vertex AI. DeepSeek R1 0528 is available on Together AI, Fireworks AI, GCP Vertex AI, Novita AI, and OpenRouter. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.